Tuesday, August 03, 2010

Matariki 2010

Matariki began for me with a Hikoi, a properly organized tour of the Rangitaane area with Paul Hortom the guide. We started in Awapuni. There we looked at old Pa sites in the lowland area.

We went to Ashurst. While Paul was telling us about Apiti a kereru came into a nearby tree and observed proceedings. It was a magical time.

We went to the karaka groves near the university. There we saw some kai that would be used in the forthcoming Rangitaane Wildfood Festival.

And then, after a bit of a kotiti, taking in a lot of information from Paul and others who contributed we came back to base, to Awapuni.

That night we all stayed at Tuturu Pumau the meeting house at Rangitaane Pa Awapuni. We practiced waka ama work indoors getting ready for an expedition or an exercise on a waka at Tangimoana the next day.

Then there was the predawn ceremony welcoming in Matariki before the haangi was lifted. And then a round of korero. And then, the haangi lifted, breakfast.

My next matariki experience was the Seven Sisters concert at Te Papa Tongarewa in Wellington. The marae area was packed out for this. There was a range of singers from Lily Tomlin to Ria Hall.

Many of the songs were originals and they were well constructed. Several singers had good backing from the likes of Puawai Cairns on guitar. The concert looked good with Puawai wearing a white tie on a black shirt. She backed Ria Hall in what seemed to be the most popular set.

Kali Kopae impressed with her set backed by James Macgaskill on bass. Bella Kalolo was also impressive with an organist behind her vocal. With Ramon Re Wake and the Compere considered this was a very even display of high quality and the Matariki Seasons at Te Papa that also involve a Seven Brothers Concert are exceptional.

And then it was on to Koowhiti; Matariki Festival of Contemporary Dance. This was on June 24-27/2010 at Te Papa Tongarewa

It was the show of shows. A comprehensive display of dance, Maori dance at Te Papa. It featured a Hakari, a Dinner at Icon the dining complex at Te Papa Tongarewa and this was remarkable for the dignitaries there. Senior politicians, High Court judges, Kerry Prendergast, the Mayor of Wellington, sundry MPs and lawyers.

Brendon Pongia of morning television was the Master of Ceremonies for the meal and he got us all down to earth with a lot of patter about Dancing with the stars. I was proud to put my hand up when Brendon asked who watched Dancing with the stars. This sorted the audience out. Here was an audience of Wellington High Culture. Lowbrows like me were in the distinct minority. But Brendon was the perfect foil, dancer and sportsman, introducing Toni Huata for some powerful waiata and getting everyone ready for the show itself, Koowhiti and the presentation of awards to follow.

And then, with a bit of a hurry-up from MC Pongia over the dessert, we all moved from the banquet room to a theatre at Te Papa for the show.

Koowhiti means to pull out or to select. It can be used to say something like, ‘the kumara were pulled out of the garden’. It also has the secondary meaning of the appearance of a new moon and there is an interesting usage with a replication of whiti in koowhitiwhiti which refers to a leaping or dancing of water.
But Koowhiti, for those who attended will always mean the performance or a set of dance performances at Te Papa Tongarewa during Te Matariki. Some of these were excerpts from earlier shows and others were new shows. There were strong similarities amongst the shows and there were differences as well. Koowhiti then was a set of shows shifting in shape like dancing water in a fountain.

Stage management was well done without fuss or fanfare by Cathy Knowsley and her crew. Lisa Maule provided very effective lighting. It all ran like clockwork and like the food at the hakari it was both elegant and sustaining as background for the performances.

Cat Ruka stood out. Dance met theatre at Koowhiti; every dance-picture told a story and hers were the best in many respects even though she did not dance much. Bare breasted, her solo dance involved props from the world of the Maori woman cigarette trapped, gang trapped, tourist trapped by toy plastic dolls, flag trapped and wrapped in a hold from which she was seriously hurt, from a warriorhood that came with the territory like a curse.

But there was much else in the show. One or two of the dancers were older but a lot were younger and they came with an open freshness, taking the lead of Tanemahuta and Merenia on stage with very clear understanding. The young ones came mainly from the Judith Fuge Dance Studio and the Commercial Dance course at the Whitireia Performing Arts Centre.

The work of Taupuhi Toki and New Native Dance was seen to effect in Paa Kingdom. And the choreography of Cathy Livermore and the Atamira Dance Company in Don’t feed the man fish took message and performance to new heights and asked new questions about things like global warming from the point of view of indigenous people.

The New Zealand School of Dance supported Merenia Gray and the Merenia Gray Dance Company in Black Rain. As well as superb dance this show had an excellent use of music and poetry ranging from the work of Hirini Melbourne and Richard Nunns to that of Hone Tuwhare.

Tanemahuta Gray used the music of Tiki Taane in his Past/Present/Future and in Tangaroa and Now this is it, keeping things current. The contemporary feel was reinforced by Future Fame appearing courtesy of Mad Fame Creative Specialists in The Inner Cosmos. This featured the music of Mr Flash and The Dorian Concept.

Merenia Gray also used poetry in Entangled, this time taking Octavio Paz’s The Sacred Fig Tree as an inspiration. Merenia cross referenced to a lot of things without losing the thread. A subtlety to be wondered at.

Some of the work went back a fair way. He Taura Whakapapa with choreography by Charles Koroneho and Te Toki Haruru came from a production by the Taiao Dance Theatre in 1990. With a theme concerning the fragility of unity the work, like all other pieces on the night posed questions that lingered.
Some of the collaboration worked extremely well, taking all kinds of risks. The support of Kid Genius Klik for Cat Ruka’s Playing Savage made for a magic combination. Playing Savage also employed the music of Chopin and Notorious BIG. The presentation carried the musical contrasts.

The way Koowhiti worked was that key performances from the past were selected with an eye on the message so that the experience of Maori over time was reflected. In Moonlight Sonata and Memoirs of Active Service dating from 2006, the Year of the Veteran, looked back to the long experience of Maori, especially Maori from remote areas in the New Zealand war machine.

Te Whenua with choreography by Moss Paterson and the Atamira Dance Company came from Whakairo of 2007. This gave Koowhiti a spiritual and mystic dimension and so connected the deep past of the Maori to Te Papa Tongarewa during Te Matariki of 2010.

Some of the work went back as it projected forward. He Taonga with choreography from Taane Mete and Taiaroa Royal and the Okareka Dance Company came from a Graduation ceremony for the New Zealand School of Dance season in 2009. This interesting work is being extended for a production in 2011.

And this was the way of the show. It looked forward as well as to the past with no holds barred, no prisoners taken and no boundaries to hem people in. And Koowhiti was made for the present. It worked in the here and now, each dance show tugging at the audience with its own immediacy.

It is to be hoped that this trio, Tanemahuta and Merenia Gray and Jenny Stevenson work together again. They are good enough as individuals; Tanemahuta pushing the envelope, Merenia creatively organizing as she reaches out to art and literature and Jenny advising and teaching. Put together they appeal immensely.

And they carry weight.

Tanemahuta and Merenia bring the whanau and what a whanau it is. There are dance connections stretching out into the world and back to the Kapiti coast. Tanemahuata had recently returned from his involvement with the New Zealand Expo in China. He and Merenia had managed with Jenny to get many dancers of different types together but the show hummed rather than grated- you weren’t sure what kind of dance you would see next but that was of no bother, it was the way of the koowhitiwhiti, the way the fountain played.

And Jenny Stevenson brought her husband Jim to Koowhiti. Jim is mentioned in the Koowhiti Programme, he is a quiet mentor, a restrained consigliere of the arts, especially dance in Wellington, a patron who knows how to make things happen and walk softly.

Each piece was an exploration with Tanemahuta Gray himself pulling out the stops, pulling back from working with Jackie Chan at the Shanghai Expo and down from aerial stuff for the night, mentoring, talking up things with his body. And that was the way of the night; all performers used their bodies to say something. It was the most open expression I’ve seen for a while, anywhere in the world. Merenia was there throughout, smoothing out the wrinkles and in every corner there was Jenny Stevenson, a mind of dance.

And then it was on to the presentation of awards. These were for contributions over a lifetime to Maori contemporary dance. And here the lifetimes were shown. Gaylene Sciascia, Tama Huata, Stephen Bradshaw, figures of a lifetime in dance. The awards were presented by the dignitaries; the Mayor of Wellington and Gregory Fortuin of the Whitireia Council and ex Race Relations Conciliator. All introduced by the indefatigably fresh Brendon Pongia, himself one of a formidable range of Maori dignitaries in attendance.

In 1977 at Rongomaraeroa marae at Porangahau Gaylene Sciascia was part of a hui for Maori dancers. In Gaylene’s lifetime of contribution dance courses have been started at places like Whitireia Polytechnic, a production called Moko was choreographed by her and then taken to China with the New Zealand Ballet Company and she is presently taking a dance group on a tour of Croatia, Slovenia and Germany.

From 1983 Tama Huata has contributed in many ways to Maori Contemporary dance and with his role as Chairman of Te Matatini, New Zealand’s largest performing arts festival, there is an important connection to kapa haka and traditional Maori dance. He is the founder and CEO of Kahurangi Maori Dance Theatre. This has 24 full-time dancers in three troupes that tour internationally. He has taken Maori dance to the world especially to North America.

The third contributor, Stephen Bradshaw has moved and shaken the world of contemporary Maori Dance since 1984. His journey has taken him from Department of Labour employment schemes involving dance in 1984 to the formation of Taiao in 1988 to the convening of a summit on contemporary Maori Dance in 2009. This summit ushered in the planning process for Koowhiti Matariki Festival of Māori Contemporary Dance in 2010.

The awards themselves came with interesting stories. Charles Koroneho had carved keys and locks and these were displayed as part of the presentations. This was yet another twist to Koowhiti, another way of entertaining and holding the attention right up there. The design concept of Toki Poutangata; lock and key was paid for by Creative New Zealand and brought sculpture to Koowhiti as Koroneho’s idea of keys to unlock the carvings were explored and shown on stage. This is all described in the handouts as;

Embodying the mana of the awards is the Toki; symbolically representing a body, a form of technical potential and precision, an expression of the highest commitment to knowledge, culture and artistic excellence. The Toki is therefore a material depiction of Maori Dance; the history, creative aspirations and cultural foundation that practitioners are collectively
working to unlock.

The concept of Poutangata is metaphorically represented by the Awards Recipient, an individual celebrated for their pursuit of excellence and unlocking the full potential of Maori Dance and Performance. Their contribution and lifelong commitment is literally cut from the body of the adze and transformed into a symbolic key, an anthropomorphic manifestation.

Dance. Lifetimes. Design Concepts. When Jenny Stevenson and Tanemahuta and Merenia Gray throw a party look at what happens as well as who turns up!

Before looking again at who showed up it was interesting who was not there. There was an uneven media presence with myself from Kia Ora FM, Palmerston North and a photographer from the Dominion-Post. I did not see anyone else from any other radio stations including National Radio or from other media like, say, The New Zealand Listener or Maori Television, TV One or Three and this is remarkable given the sheer quality of the visual and aural work and its national significance.

Fortuin was the most loquacious speaker of the night and this was, I think, because he grasped the nettle of national significance in Koowhiti. A Maori speaking South African, as well as grasping it he really articulated the shared pride in the dance from all quarters rather than knowing what we all mean as per the rest of the Kiwi Digs.

Gregory Fortuin talking about Koowhiti reminded me of Bernard Levin in the Times of London writing about Kiri Te Kanawa, the gusher helping to push the star to shining point. A pity Gregory does not have a column in the Dompost or the NBR! These curiosities and speculations aside there is no question that it was a show wanted on high, wanted by the parliamentarians, the High Court Judges and the Mayor and her Deputy, wanted as a point in Matariki, wanted for a shared celebration. The murmur of a national holiday to celebrate Te Matariki came to ear and mind.

With a quality performance and a sold out attendance the question of publicity and promotion might be put alongside another question about the lack of a substantial sponsor. Kiri Te Kanawa had Mobil Oil, Benson and Hedges and a mix of Covent Garden, Norman Kirk and, of all people HRH Prince Charles behind her. And forty or fifty years ago the world of entertainment and art was a smaller place without the internet so these things were more easily patronized and sponsored. Where is the support from corporate and government for a show like Koowhiti? It is simply not enough to have Jim Stevenson and the events people from Te Papa rallying the troops in support with Jenny, Tanemahuta and Merenia and all networking furiously to make things happen.

Aside from the quality and power of the performance the whole event including those who bought tickets to the dinner and showed up to watch poses some pretty big questions. There is something of a brow problem as in high or low brow, or something of a block problem as in a mental block with all of this. Dancing with the stars is at one end of a spectrum while the work of the New Zealand Ballet Company is at another. Kapa Haka is in one corner and works like Te Koowhiti are in another.

This difference of brows, this blockage, does not seem to apply to the people deeply involved in dance such as Tanemahuta, Merenia or Jenny or any of their dancers, But it might apply to those watching. Or not watching. The kind of turnout of Digs, Maori and Pakeha Dignitaries, at Koowhiti is not seen, at least in my experience, at Kapa Haka festivals. Nor, again in my experience at least, is the range of people attending Kowhiti seen at New Zealand Ballet performances.

There is, of course the question; what exactly is this? Modern Maori Dance? Kapa Haka? Maori Ballet? Maori Burlesque? Anything goes and to great effect as in the case of Cat Ruka. Koowhiti may not have been what Sir Apirana Ngata had in mind after the First World War when he encouraged people to join concert parties as part of an attempt to foster Maori performance that itself encouraged people to speak and sing Maori. Nor is it something greatly written about and one goes back to Jennifer Shennan’s good book, The Maori Action Song published by the NZCER in 1984 for a steer on the subject.

But whatever Koowhiti, the play of light in dance, is, it is ours, it is here and it is exciting. There is innocence about it all for us to experience like the country Aotearoa/New Zealand itself.

Coming back to the patchy media coverage of something held at the national museum a block for work like Koowhiti does seem to exist in the media. It is as though Koowhiti is a secret, something for the cognoscenti with blocks for others in the silliest of places; media and sponsorship…

But looking at it from a national or even a nationalistic basis there was a significant and telling presence, a social and political representation of who we are at Koowhiti. People like Fortuin and Prendergast, people who eventually lead opinion are exceedingly comfortable with the work as presented at Koowhiti. The question of shared national experience of the arts arises; has Koowhiti offered us something that we can all share in an unabashed way? Something fresh and clear like, to refer to her once again, Kiri Te Kanawa at the Mobil Song Quests in the sixties. The impression given by the Prendergasts and Fortuins was that Koowhiti was something that might be shared and valued by all of us. I agree.

Peter Cleave
Palmerston North
July 2010

Monday, July 12, 2010

Papers on Social Work Fourth Edition

Papers on Social Work 4th Edition by Peter Cleave has been released by Campus Press, There is a discussion of Whanau Ora the New Zealand government's strategy for social work announced in April-May 2010. There is a revisiting of the theme of restorative justice. All this and the classic, prize winning essays on social work education and value systems that have made Papers on Social Work one of the best selling books in the Campus Press set, internationally and locally.


Papers on Social Work, Fourth Edition has the ISBN
978-1-877229-47-3

NZD 60.00 including tax plus 7.50 Post and Pack no matter how big the order.

Payment COD into nominated account.

Delivery within a month.

Order through comment or email to puffmedia@yahoo.co.nz using the Order Form at the bottom of this email.

About the author.
It is said that Peter Cleave has more books in New Zealand Libraries than any other author. Beginning as a collaborator on The Oxford Picture Dictionary of Maori in 1979 there has been a consistent pattern of a book published, an article in a referred journal and then a radio commentary repeated over a long period. With this pattern of published work have come the prizes; the First Class Masterate from Auckland University and a Commonwealth scholarship to the University of Oxford, the Phillip Bagby Scholarship and Rhodes Foundation funds while doing the Oxford Doctorate, the chair of the college common room and on from these to taking the prizes for best paper at conferences like the International Federation of Social Workers in Montreal in 2000.

Peter Cleave is without peer at the meeting place of language, culture and criticism, locally and internationally and this is seen in the sale of his books to libraries in New Zealand and Australia and around the world.

At the same time Peter Cleave, a former captain of the Manurewa High School First Fifteen in South Auckland, works on community radio and touches base with working people. He left school to work on the MV Tofua, a Banana Boat and began to learn about the Pacific, something he is still doing.

About Campus Press
Campus Press is the biggest academic press outside the universities in New Zealand. It was established in 1992 and for the last twelve years has been based in Palmerston North. Campus Press mostly supplies libraries.

Papers on Social Work, 4th Edition follows other releases in 2010 like Takutai: the Foreshore and Seabed, New Zealand’s most topical book with implications for US, European and other coastlines. ISBN 978-1-877229-46-6 See the attachment for the cover.



Takutai, the foreshore and seabed by Peter Cleave gives an historical background and then an analysis of the 2004 Foreshore and Seabed Act and the 2009 Ministerial Review. There is a wide range of examples of co-governance and co-management by iwi and councils of the foreshore and seabed from around Aotearoa/New Zealand. International case studies are also given. The Conclusion sets the scene for the Repeal of the Act and the introduction of new legislation in 2010.

What the critics had to say about the advance article;

one of the most well-conceived discussions of the present state of the Act that exists in print anywhere. …an extremely useful contribution not only to academic discourse, but to issues affecting the national life of the country.

Professor Paul Moon

Takutai costs 57.00NZD from Campus Press with a 7.50 NZD freight charge no matter how big the order.

Order by return email using the Order Form at the bottom of this email if you like.

 

Full Review of Peter Cleave’s Ten Volume Set

By Paul Moon

July 2009

The very nature of academic publishing is that it serves a niche market, and in a country as small as New Zealand, that niche can be so narrow that some books probably never see the light of day because they are simply uneconomic to produce. So when a ten-volume set of books is released, written by Professor Peter Cleave – one of New Zealand’s respected academics – attention is bound to be aroused by the scale of the venture, and by the promise of a substantial body of content.

The work’s opening volume comprises a collection of articles, some of which are new, and some of which are revised versions of existing articles that Cleave has written or presented. The relevancy of the work is underscored by the first paper, which contains suggested options for dealing with the vexed issue of the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004. The Government has indicated that it will reach some conclusions on this matter within the next two months, but regardless of what is decided, it will be interesting to see the extent to which Cleave’s recommendations are reflected in Government policy, and for academics to debate some of the themes raised long after any settlement has been made at a political level. This article stands out as being the most detailed in this volume, and certainly one of the most well-conceived discussions of the present state of the Act that exists in print anywhere. For this piece alone, the first volume in this collection makes an extremely useful contribution not only to academic discourse, but to issues affecting the national life of the country.

Other articles in this volume focus on issues surrounding Maori language – its survival, its transition from an oral to a written language, and its re-emergence as an oral and written language. To this is added a highly original and possibly even provocative piece on conceptual interpretations of pa; a reflection on issues associated with the 1981 Springbok rugby tour to New Zealand, and concludes with a series of brief but brilliant articles which tackle a variety of culturally-charged concepts, and which, among much else, challenge the reader’s understanding of meanings associated with them.

From a collection of articles, Cleave then provides in the second volume of this collection a book. Starting points? A discussion of contemporary Maori society and culture, is primarily about New Zealand historiography, into which is injected a broad range of arguments and perspectives relating to issues such as culture, identity, tradition and modernity, and the media. One of the great strengths of this volume is the extent to which Cleave is able to draw on international material and examples to illuminate his arguments, without the reader ever getting the sense that he is being overwhelmed by comparative examples from other countries. It is a difficult balance to establish, but when handled as masterfully as in Starting Points? The benefits are immediately apparent. The theme of literacy raised in the first volume reappears briefly in this one, but in a substantially different context, with a strong connection with the way in which history works in cultures that had/have strong oral components. In the central sections of this volume is a series of analyses of the works of other writers, in which Cleave adopts the format of quoting passages from articles, and then providing a commentary on them. This is an approach to criticism that is too seldom utilised. In the case of this volume, it has enabled Cleave to deconstruct and then reconstruct ideas and themes, using these sources as interchangeable building blocks – able to be assembled in a variety of forms according to the writer’s perspectives.

Following on from Starting Points? is the third edition of one of Cleave’s seminal works: Rangahau pae iti kahurangi: Research in a small world of light and shade. This work, on themes and approaches to research in a broadly Maori context, has become a recommended text book for many tertiary course around the country, and draws heavily on traditional concepts of learning and understanding as part of the basis for one of the frameworks of research. The traditional is not closed off from critique, however, and Cleave’s great strength in this area is his ability to combine an in-depth cultural knowledge with recent scholarship on research, producing insightful and useful conclusions for anyone engaged in this area of study.

Another third edition in this collection is Papers on Social Work. His volume is made up of seven papers dealing with subjects from the more standard ones, such as ethics, to the some unlikely choices, such as the city space and social work, and the thematically-related article on places of inquiry. Yet, whether predictable or otherwise, Cleave brings new insights and challenging perspectives to the reader. Even the most experienced social work practitioner would be bound to have the perceptions of their profession augmented as a result of reading this book and absorbing some of its ideas.

Papers on Social Work is followed by the 244-page volume Papers on Language. Made up of thirteen articles, this work has Cleave again drawing on a useful quantity of international scholarship, and revealing why he is so highly-regarded in the academic community. There are too few writers in this country capable of combining material from so many different disciplines and in a way that produces such a wide variety of perspectives. Again, there is some material here that appears elsewhere, but its precise employment this volume avoids any sense of repetition. A few of the shorter articles in this volume would be suited mainly for teachers of te reo, but otherwise, the tenor of the works as a whole is well-suited to the general academic reader.

The next book in this collection is the 197-page What do we know about the mark on the wall? Images, rules and prior knowledge. As for its subject, Cleave opens with the teasing line: ‘As the author I still have difficulty saying what his book is about’. But rather than answer with a pithy summary, Cleave allows the ideas contained in this work to speak for themselves – no more, no less. Themes about the meaning of ideas, place, and memory compete with topics on historiography, sociolinguistics, and social geography, among many others. This is probably the most challenging book in the collection. Cleave moves, sometimes with great speed, from one topic to another, often leaving just hints of whole new areas of potential exploration. The reader might feel settled with an idea, and then in the next paragraph, Cleave might challenge that idea from several angles, before hauling the topic elsewhere, with a series of careful thematic links. There is no stated topic for this book, and nor ought there to be. It is like a rhapsody, with different motifs surfacing at various points, connected by very little at times, yet, at the conclusion, it all seems to have a link of sorts to the idea of knowledge. This is possibly one of the most satisfying yet challenging works in the collection.

Te Pu Tapere- the impulse to perform, formerly known as Depot Takirua, is the third edition of this work, and focuses mainly on the electronic media. At 204 pages, it is as substantial a work as any of its companion volumes in this collection, and for those studying film and television in New Zealand, it would be indispensible. This most certainly ought to be a prescribed text for all media students. The portrayal of Maori in film and television comes in for close scrutiny here, and Cleave seizes on several deficiencies and stereotypes in the way culture is presented in popular culture. The chapter on Jane Campion’s The Piano is one of the outstanding portions of this book, and as all the other chapters, offers insights that hitherto have not been available to readers interested in these areas of study. Some of the essays in this work date back to the 1990s, but have been revised where appropriate to maintain their currency.

Iwi Station: A Discussion of Print, Radio, Television, and the Internet in Aotearoa/ New Zealand also has a string media focus, as the title suggests. However, in keeping with the general approach of the other volumes in this collection, Cleave has added elements of history, sociology, and anthropology into the mix. And instead of merely being descriptive about the topics he has chosen, Cleave continually probes and questions to elicit deeper meanings behind them. This is most certainly a text that should be compulsory reading for every journalist and person involved in the media in New Zealand. In particular, it lifts the lid on the sorts of conceptual developments in thought that have led to the status the media currently has in New Zealand.

This collection, coming out as a single set, is unique in New Zealand academic writing. But the format and quantity side, the lasting value of these works is in the ideas they express and the changes in perception that they will bring about for the reader. Cleave deserves full praise for the contribution he has made in these works to the intellectual conversation about New Zealandness.

Paul Moon is Professor of History at Te Ara Poutama, the faculty of Maori Development at AUT University.

There are ten books in the basic Campus Press set. All of these are 200 pages or more in length. Terms of Trade are that the books are available from Campus Press for 57.00 NZD as individual titles or for 400.00 NZD for the Collection.

An Order Form is copied below. To order simply copy the send it by return to this email.

Terms of trade are $57.00 to Campus Press. There is a $7.50 Post and Package cost no matter how big the order is.

Titles and ISBN numbers are below;

978-1-877229-35-0 Aotearoa, papers of contest, Third Edition

978-1-877229-32-9 Maori Unpacked Second Edition

978-1-877229-37-4 Iwi Station Second Edition

978-1-877229-39-8 Papers on Language Third Edition

978-1-877229-42-8 Papers on Social Work Third Edition

978-1-877229-43-5 Rangahau pae iti kahurangi Third Edition

978-1-877229-44-2 What do we know about the mark on the wall Third Edition

978-1-877229-43-5 Te Pu Tapere- the Impulse to perform, formerly titled, From the Depot Takirua, Third Edition

978-1-877229-41-1 Papers to conference Fourth Edition

978-1-877229-38-1 Starting Points


Campus Press


Order Form


Purchaser's Order Number.....


Please send us a copy or copies of

1 Aotearoa, Papers of Contest, Third Edition, Peter
Cleave x....

2 Papers to Conference, Fouth Edition Peter Cleave x.....
3 Papers on Social Work, Fourth Edition, Peter
Cleave x....

4 Te Pu Tapere, the impulse to perform, Peter
Cleave x…

5 Papers on Language, Third Edition, Peter Cleave x...

6 What do we know about the mark on the wall? Third Edition, Peter Cleave x...

7 Iwi Station, a discussion of print, radio and television in Aotearoa/New Zealand, Peter Cleave x

8 Maori Unpacked, Peter Cleave x...

9 Starting Points, a discussion of contemporary Maori culture and society, Peter Cleave x...

10 Rangahau pae iti kahurangi, research in a small world of light and shade,
Peter Cleave x...

11 Takutai; the foreshore and seabed x...

12 Ten Volumes, a Collection by Peter Cleave x.....


Please send these books to;

Attention;

Monday, April 05, 2010

The Foreshore and Seabed and Restorative Justice

In a recent speech Tariana Turia (Turia 2010) made some points about restorative justice and the foreshore and seabed.

To backtrack just a little, what is restorative justice? This is a form of justice where the offender makes good to the victim in some way. The offender gets to know who the victim is. Then there is the matter of what the offender should give to the victim. Sometimes this is done through families, the family of the victim and that of the offender meet to discuss some form of restitution.

In Aotearoa/New Zealand the best known expression of restorative justice might well be the FGC as the Family Group Conference is known. This was introduced in the 1989 Children, Young Persons and their Families Act. This is called between families by the court or a court appointed officer.

The next question to be ‘back-tracked’ might be; what is the matter of the foreshore and seabed? This refers to the foreshore and seabed of Aotearoa/New Zealand and also to some legislation, the 2004 Foreshore and Seabed Act of 2004. This was an act that forbad Maori to take claims over the foreshore and seabed to court. It was very unpopular and lead to a protest march and the formation of the Maori Party of which Tariana Turia ia co-leader.

In 2009 the Act is set to be repealed and replaced with something else ( see Cleave 2010).

It could be the period after 2010, the time after the scrapping of the Foreshore and Seabed legislation will be one where people are claiming different things in different ways. The Treaty of Waitangi especially Article Two will always be in the foreground of of such claims but there are other arguments to be made. In March 2010 in a speech to the National Restorative Justice Aotearoa Practitioners Conference Tariana Turia, co-leader of the Maori Party looks for restorative justice with respect to the foreshore and seabed.

Tariana Turia starts by saying;

‘For if there was ever a case of turning the tide of injustice into a more enduring and peaceful solution, we would find that in the call for the repeal of the Foreshore and Seabed Act.’

Tariana Turia goes on to talk about an explicit association between restorative justice and the Foreshore and Seabed Act of 2004 which was clearly to be seen in the Ministerial Review of that Act in 2009;

‘The submissions revealed the extent of the injustice felt by many.
The Human Rights Commission described the Act as a “decisive set back in Crown-Tangata whenua relationships”.
Te Ope Mana a Tai reported that “the Foreshore and Seabed Act will never be viewed by iwi/hapu as anything other than an instrument of confiscation”.
And the Dunedin branch of CORSO argued that “the Government should be proving to the international community that we are redressing our pained history of unjust confiscation of traditionally held land, not continuing this legacy of raupatu as this legislation does”.’

The mention of raupatu is important and Turia returns to it later in her speech which is reproduced in its entirety below. Muru might have been mentioned as there is a sense in which plunder of Maori resources occurred in the 2004 Act. Similarly, utu might also have been talked about below as some sort of reciprocal adjustment might be invoked. It may be that the blindingly obvious things to say such as there has been a takahi of the mana of the Maori a trampling of the prestige of the Maori, have been left out.

Tariana Turia points out;

‘…restorative justice, in its purest sense, is a process designed to reduce the impact of crime on victims, and to hold offenders accountable for their actions.
It is about enabling victims a voice in the system, and providing the space for them to receive reparation, apologies and answers.
In the case of the Foreshore and Seabed Act, the offending party was universally recognised as the Government. Accordingly the accountability for redress and restoration was also in Government hands. Te Hunga Roia Maori o Aotearoa/The Maori Law Society put this view forward by saying
“A Government that has the courage to enter into discussions is likely to find that genuine and enduring solutions are available, with a little creativity, and a commitment to achieving justice”.’

Having defined perpetrator and victim Tariana Turia proceeds to look for restorative justice through a Treaty process;

‘We stand then, on the brink of history, straddling between the dark, desperate days of the 2004 Act; and the future which will emerge from the review of that Act negotiated as a key milestone in the relationship agreement signed between the National and Maori Parties.
In a few weeks time, the Government will be embarking on a consultation exercise to face the community, and to address the longstanding grievances that have remained in the aftermath of the Foreshore and Seabed Act.
The confiscation of the foreshore and seabed, like the alienation and extinguishment of Maori land, has all the hallmarks of the situations that may be most effectively dealt with in a restorative justice approach.
For if we think of restorative justice as requiring a full account of history; an acknowledgement of wrong done; forgiveness, healing, reparation and the restoration of effective relationships, then the treaty settlement process would seem to be entirely consistent.’

The treaty settlement process Tariana Turia evokes replaces the Family Group Conference as the point at which arbitration occurs. Some imagery lingers and there are cross-overs. Effectively there are now two ‘families’ tangata whenua and tangata tiriti;

‘Turning the tide would mean we are prepared to face the injustices of our history; and work towards the articulation of the truth in order to heal broken relationships and achieve reconciliation between Maori and the Crown.
Achieving Treaty justice is not, however, just about a Bill of Rights for Maori.
Achieving Treaty justice is also about the opportunities for all New Zealanders to benefit from the rights of nationhood.
As Judge Taihakurei Durie has said, “We must remember that if we are the tangata whenua, the original people; then the Pakeha are tangata tiriti, those who belong to the land by that Treaty”.’

Tangat tiriti is an example of what Fenton and Moon have called relexification (Fenton and Moon 2000). This is sometimes a matter of critique. An example of a word wearing out or threatening to do so might be kaitiakitanga;

16 February 2009 Media Statement

‘Kaitiakitanga in tourism now a joke


The Government's decision to mine New Zealand's national parks makes a mockery of the Ministry of Tourism's guiding principle of 'kaitiakitanga', says Labour’s Tourism and Associate Maori Affairs spokesperson Kelvin Davis.
"The Ministry claims this guiding principle is the basis of their approach to sustainable management of our natural environment for future generations.
“It is an insult to Maori that our language and culture is used to embellish a Ministry's mission statement when the Government tramples all over its true meaning.
“Mining of national parks is contrary to the value of kaitiakitanga and the best interests of New Zealand's tourism industry,” Kelvin Davis says.
“Tourists come to New Zealand to view our landscapes and appreciate our Maori culture, not to take photos of big holes in the ground.
“If kaitiakitanga is not to be practised in reality, the word needs to be removed from the Ministry of Tourism's mission statement in order to stop the pretence that kaitiakitanga is a value of this National Government."’

Tariana Turia is speaking after a period of lexical change. The Maori LanguageCommission, Te Taura Whiri i te Reo has been active since the mid seventies and some words like kaitiaitanga and, perhaps, taonga (cf Goldsmith 200?) have been used a lot in the worlds of politics and government..

Coming back to Tariana Turia’s speech, the treaty settlement process offers, like the Family Group Conference, a safe environment for Maori;

‘The greatest strength of the restorative justice approach is that it reminds us of the views of victims, who say that to experience justice they need to talk about the offence and its effects in a safe environment.
Following on from that, we know that whanau, hapu and iwi have often found the hearings process of their claims to be extremely painful, but also provide the impetus for a stronger understanding of their histories. It gives them a context to appreciate their experience. And importantly, it creates a platform from which to build a future.
But all too frequently the hearings – whilst open to the public – are heard only by tangata whenua. Tangata tiriti stay away – perhaps out of ignorance, perhaps out of respect. But until the stories are shared, reconciliation will never be achieved.’

The process of sharing stories goes with a sharing of rituals between groups, between families (Cleave 2009). There are two traditions here, one involving a Polynesian form of social work and one involving a form of social work derived from Europe (Khulmann and Cleave 2000).

As Tariana Turia says hers is a wide ranging approach;

‘I have gone much broader than perhaps you expected this morning, in applying the restorative justice concept to the wider sense of injustice still felt so keenly within Maori communities.
But in essence what you may be talking about in an individual sense, is much the same as what I am talking about in a collective sense.
The restorative justice process encourages an environment in which the offender takes responsibility, demonstrates accountability for their actions, creating room for dialogue.
The essential difference that I am describing is that pertaining to a world view of collective responsibility.’

Having taken the idea of families interacting to heart Tariana Turia proceeds to make a case for things working out best when families are healthy;

‘I believe that the family group conferences introduced in the 1989 Children, Young Persons and their Families Act respected both the central importance of the collective in Maori society, while providing the policy foundation for the restorative justice process.
The FGC process remains a central component of the youth justice system for dealing with offending by youth from 10 to 16 years.
For adult offenders, restorative justice can occur as part of the Police Adult Diversion process; pre sentence, or post sentence in the parole of offenders and as part of reintegration back into the community.
All of these points provide an opportunity to bring the whanau together, to draw on the collective strengths of the family context to make things right.
Although of course restorative justice processes are not unique to Maori, the processes do have strong alignment with Maori values such as reconciliation, reciprocity and whanau involvement.
The key, as always, lies in the implementation.
And so this is where I come to whanau ora as unlocking that key.
I absolutely believe that whanau ora has the ability to bring the nation forward, to transform the way in which we relate together.
It is my heartfelt belief that when you build capability within the whanau, you build the capacity of the country.
At its very core, whanau ora is about the wellbeing of the group. While any number of professionals have the instruments to measure and record statistical progress of individuals, such measurements are not an adequate reflection of whanau wellbeing.
Whanau ora, then, is not just about the accumulated results of a group of individuals – it is primarily about the way in which the group operates as a whole to achieve health and wellbeing for its people.
It is about the strength of the whanau in having knowledge of their whakapapa, history and identity; being confident in singing their own waiata; in recalling the stories and the korero of their ancestors.
It is about expressing value and respect for all who belong to them – tamariki, matua, kuia, kaumatua.
Whanau ora is the fullest realisation of the roles, functions and responsibilities we have to each other. It will be seen in people who are able to collectively meet their own community and family responsibilities, rather than depending on someone else to tell them how to be.
It is about being able to make decisions and participate in all aspects of life.
It is about knowing that we will be there for each other.’

In a fairly bold statement Tariana Turia opens out the prospect of families being agents of change;

‘I believe that restorative justice processes that recognise whanau as the foundation for change, are far more likely to reach enduring resolution.
I have been concerned that in some cases, professionals or outside groups appear to replace the role of whanau in the restorative justice approach. In my mind, there is no substitute for the role that whanau can play in ensuring their own family members are responsible and accountable for their actions.
I am absolutely committed to the vision that Maori strengths, strategies and solutions that encompass the whole whanau will create the wellbeing that we all aspire towards.
Restorative justice can play a useful role in ensuring we take on a more positively framed approach to addressing the issues that confront us – and we do that by restoring the sense of responsibility to shift our focus from talk and to act now.
I believe that whanau ora is the transformation that we have been looking for, to determine our own destinies, to shape our future.
Whanau ora is about turning the tide from the currents of despair and disempowerment, to the source of our greatest potential for change – each other.
The tide is in for transformation to occur. Let us share our stories, voice our own solutions and focus our collective strengths on creating the nation that our ancestors desired when they signed up to the promise of Te Tiriti o Waitangi.’


In March 2010 as repeal of the 2004 Foreshore and Seabed Act segues into new legislation Tariana is using the means at her disposal to make a point. Those means are the theory and practice of restorative justice and the notion of the whanau along with an idea of health, ora. Along with these theories, ideas and notions there are the actual words used, the language tools of the time in Maori and in English such as ‘restorative justice’ and ‘whanau ora’, ‘tangata whenua’ and ‘tangata tiriti’.


Bibliography


Brown Michael F, 2004 Who Owns Native Culture? Harvard University Press

Cleave, Peter, 2009, Takutai, the foreshore and seabed, Campus Press

Cleave, Peter 2009 Papers on Social Work, Campus Press

Fenton, Sabine and Moon Paul2000 Cultural and linguistic hybridity: the relexification of the Maori language and its implications for social and cultural change in Cleave (ED) The Nurturing Shield: a collection of writings on the Maori language pp3-26 Campus Press

Goldsmith, Michael 2009 Who owns Native Nature? Discourses of Rights to Land, Culture and Knowledge in New Zealand International Journal of Cultural Property 16: 325-339

Khulmann, Carola and Cleave, Peter 2000 ‘Language and Mutual Aid’, in Cleave (edit) The Nurturing Shield pp159-176 Campus Press

Turia, Tariana, March 27 2010 ‘Restorative Justice : turning the tide’ speech to National Restorative Justice Aotearoa Practitioners Conference
Brentwood Hotel, Kilbirnie, Wellington